New Rearch for Breast Cancer Promising

Kudos to McGill University!!!!! Advancement is what is needed for a better quality of life.



In many cases, cancer cancer can only be detected in the advanced stages and mammography is costly, subjects patient to radiation, and remains the subject of scrutiny as it's purpose is often questioned. No cure for cancer exists today, and early detection seems to have no bearing on the final outcome--as there is no cure.

However, a research team at McGill University has developed new technology that can accurately measure protein biomarkers. Scientists have worked feverishly for years trying to develop a blood test for cancer based on the presence of Carcinoembryonic Antigen, a protein biomarker for cancer identified 40 years ago. The problem is this biomarker is found in healthy individuals as well as those with cancer.

Recently a biomedical engineering group from McGill's Goodman Cancer Research Centre measured the profile of 32 proteins in the blood of 11 healthy controls and 17 individuals that had a particular subset of cancer with astonishing results.

Researchers found that a subset of six of the 32 proteins could be used to establish a fingerprint for this cancer and classify each of these patients and healthy controls as having or not having breast cancer.The end result is to develop a simple test to be given in a doctor's office with a droplet of blood.

This is positive research for many women as 1 in 8 will be diagnosed with cancer. What makes a female and male anatomically different defines what and who we are. Breast cancer is often very difficult to accept or overcome.  Kudos to McGill University for working diligently towards a better quality of life for women. Cancer is a dirty word and we are no closer now than 100 years ago to a solution. This kind of research is the kind we need! When people hear about the positive results of this type of research, comfort is found.



Turning Biology into an Engineering Discipline

Imagine a Tree that grows in the shape of a Chair

What will be the role of our future and Biology?

Five Questions: Turning Microbes Into Micro Refineries

According to the above online article synthetic biologist Reshma Shetty predicts that we will eventually engineer organisms to grow everything that we manufacture today. This may be a huge jump, but as we move forward we all realize that life must change if we are to continue to coexist on this planet or any other planet for that matter.

If you google the company website run by Reshma Shetty and her agents this is the initial caption: 

The organism is the product.

Ginkgo BioWorks sells engineered organisms that make the world better. Ginkgo BioWorks was founded in 2008 by five MIT PhDs. The mission is to make biology easy to engineer. Only when biological engineering is fast and predictable will we fulfill the potential of biological technologies to revolutionize the provision of food, medicine, energy, and materials.

You treat biology like an engineer’s tool kit. how does that work? There’s all this genome sequencing data from different organisms all over the world. Think of that as a parts list. These organisms each have cool things that they do. If I want to build a system for biofuel, I can pull out enzymes that produce the fuel and put the parts together in different ways until I get yields high enough to compete with oil.

My suggestion concerning this odd article is to go to their website and read the information they provide:http://ginkgobioworks.com/tech.html

The introduction of modified organisms is a realitively new field and merits serious concerns. Do not be fooled into thinkg all is well. Ethical guidlines must be put into place in order to insure public safety. Some of the new organisms they claim to be perfecting are:

Electrofuels
Ginkgo BioWorks is engineering an organism for the energy industry in partnership with the DOE that converts electricity and CO2 to liquid transportation fuels.

Sulferisms
Petroleum refining generates 163 million tons of Hydrogen Sulfide annually. Ginkgo BioWorks is engineering an organism in partnership with the DOE to capture the energy in this waste product and convert it to usable fuels and valuable organic compounds.

Six Month Turnaround 
Ginkgo engineers deliver scale-up-ready organisms in six months for the production of renewable fine and specialty chemicals. Our customers include sugar refiners, flavor and fragrance companies, and other producers of fine chemicals.

All this information sounds impressive, but how will it protect the general public, how will it help the general public. These are the questions I have on the subject. It appears the interest of the company is to solely generate large sums of money. What a shallow existence to simply seek large sums of money. No good thing has ever come from the company that seeks only money. Along with the increase in technology many are forgetful of the increase in humaninology---a term I just coined. It means people must realize that people are not animals. We can no longer shove problems under the rug. The attitude of "get while the getting is good" only produces an atmosphere conducive to defeat and a future that is void of expression, love, and all the ingredients that make this world unique.

Do we live in a world that no longer cherishes humanity? Will we progress to a station in which people are of zero importance? To strive for money is hollow. In a parting comment Reshma says, "We want to democratize access so anyone can engineer biology."

Is this their idea of a joke? Do they feel as if they as the sole controlers of this industry? I think not and that God my life isn't so empty.  

The Cost of Experimentation

 Styling Spring Dandelions Discovered Wearing Mesh Metal Hats?

What Does the Word Nano Really Mean? And What is Nanomesh?

      The first step to understanding dandelions wearing mesh hats is to define the word nano. According to the essay by Sacha Loeve titled "About a Definition of Nano: How to Articulate Nano and Technology" nano holds several meanings, but in each and every case the word 'nano' is associated with something very, very, very, small. Such is the case with the new metal mesh designed by researchers at the University of California, Irvine, HRL laboratories and the California Institute of Technology, which can rest on the bloom of a dandelion without damaging it.

Typical of a scientist trying to explain the nano mesh is found in this diagram below. The long and the short of the explanation is as follows according to the online article I found in Daily Tech: "To build the incredible nanomesh, the researchers first made a polymer mesh using a self-propagating photopolymer waveguide technique.  Thiol-ene was the selected class of photopolymers (thiol-enes are four-branched hyrocarbon molecules with a central junction of silicon and a sulfur connector midway on each branch).

An electroless nickel plating technique was then applied.  When you want to coat a solid object in metal, one common way is to use electricity to force metal atoms to stick to the surface.  Another method relies on a chemical reaction to plate.  In this case the reaction is between hydrated phosphates and nickel, which is auto-catalyzing.

The end result is a 100 nm thick layer of NiP, that's 7% phosphorous and 93% nickel by weight.  The layer is solid, and is a (supersaturated) solution of phosphorous.

The photo plastic is then eaten away using etching techniques.  What is left behind is essential tubes made out of smaller tube "beams".  This tubes out of tubes approach yields a substance that's surprisingly strong, but is also 99.99 percent air."



I consider all the possibilities for the use of this new nanomesh, but currently the cost is very expensive and not available for commercial use. So what is it good you may ask? I think we can not afford not to experiment and must press forward in the world of science. Imagine using this mesh for a webbing to keep birds from flying into the turbines of jets. Imagine wearing clothes made from mesh that never had to be washed in the conventional method---using millions of gallons of water---but instead simple shaking off the residue. As we forge into the future with nanotechnology which is applied to biology and all the sciences, we must keep in mind that in order to find answers we must try new things---some of the new ideas will be functional and some will not. 

Scientists Make a Huge Mistake

Will it cost you your own Life? 

Each day we unknowingly place the safety of lives in the hands of doctors, scientists, and alleged professionals. Should we or should we not?

     

     Scientists, doctors, judges and lawyers are essentially no different than the average human being in that they can make mistakes. Consider this example as evidence to support this claim. This is a Leopard frog or so most scientists thought for the last century or so, but infact recent DNA testing proved to have incredible results. According to the story in a recent on-line article from Rutgers University "Lead author and evolutionary biologist Cathy Newman was completing her master’s at The University of Alabama while working with Leslie Rissler, associate professor of biological sciences at Alabama, on an unrelated study of the southern leopard frog species when Newman first contacted doctoral candidate and co-author Jeremy Feinberg at Rutgers in New Jersey. Newman asked for help on her project, and in return, Feinberg, an ecologist, asked the geneticists if they could help him investigate some "unusual frogs" whose weird-sounding calls were different from other leopard frogs."

      The unusual croak of the frog alerted the Feinberg to test the frog, but how long would this mistaken identity have gone on and are their other circumstances?

 

Stumbling Over Data: Mistakes Fuel Climate-Warming Skeptics is the title of an online article listing several recent mistakes made by supposed experts and suggests that mistakes can be made so everyone should fact check information. Granted these mistakes are not life threatening, but what if they were?

     The point of this blog is to simply suggest that even experts can make mistakes so do not be surprised when it happens and always take the time to find out for yourself before it is too late

What is the truth with Algae Fuel. Is it possible?
This blog settles the current idea or notions the common Joe may have about the possible use of algae as a form of gasoline.
Research for this blog was taken from different sources to be listed at the end of the blog.


The short answer is no! Algae will not be turned into buy-able gasoline anytime in the near future. The main reason fuel will not come from algae is because it would cost a great deal per gallon and it would take a great deal of energy to produce the fuel which makes it of no value at this point.

What circumstances have given rise to even consider algae as a fuel source?

High oil prices and the idea of competing for oil on the global market make it necessary to consider other options for fuel. According to Wikipedia "High oil prices, competing demands between foods and other biofuel sources, and the world food crisis, have ignited interest in algaculture (farming algae) for making vegetable oil, biodiesel, bioethanol, biogasoline, biomethanol, biobutanol and other biofuels, using land that is not suitable for agriculture. Among algal fuels' attractive characteristics: they do not affect fresh water resources, can be produced using ocean and wastewater, and are biodegradable and relatively harmless to the environment if spilled. Algae cost more per unit mass (as of 2010, food grade algae costs ~$5000/tonne), due to high capital and operating costs, yet are claimed to yield between 10 and 100 times more energy per unit area than other second-generation biofuel crops. One biofuels company has claimed that algae can produce more oil in an area the size of a two car garage than a football field of soybeans, because almost the entire algal organism can use sunlight to produce lipids, or oil. The United States Department of Energy estimates that if algae fuel replaced all the petroleum fuel in the United States, it would require 15,000 square miles (39,000 km²) which is only 0.42% of the U.S. map or about half of the land area of Maine. This is less than ¹⁄₇ the area of corn harvested in the United States in 2000. However, these claims remain unrealized, commercially. According to the head of the Algal Biomass Organization algae fuel can reach price parity with oil in 2018 if granted production tax credits.(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algae_fuel)

What other credible opinions exist regarding fundamental questions about algae as a fuel source?


According to this article in National Geographic: Facts on Algae Biofuel by Lexa W. Lee (http://greenliving.nationalgeographic.com/algae-biofuel-2814.html)
"Algae consume large amounts of carbon dioxide, a major greenhouse gas and contributor to global warming. When harvested and dried, algae can also be burned directly like wood, coal or peat to generate heat and energy. However, critics of genetic engineering warn of harmful effects should modified algae escape from confinement into the natural environment, where they could potentially compete against wild species. Proponents, however, argue that such a crisis would be unlikely, since the modified algae must be cultivated under carefully controlled conditions and would likely not survive outside.

Are there current companies that specialize if fact finding experiments on Algae?

Yes. The most well known company in the US is called Sapphire Energy in California. Operating form a government grant for research and donations from the likes of Bill Gates the company boasts operating funds exceeding 100 million.---which will be used to complete a 300 acre demonstration pond in New Mexico.

The message I am getting from reading tons of information is simply: Genetically modified algae can be dangerous if not contained properly. Characteristics of algae, such as its ability to consume carbon dioxide make it perfect for our needs. However, currently it is in no way possible or ready for the gas tank. I suggest keeping an eye on Sapphire and other companies testing algae. Certainly our country must have a different source of fuel than fossil fuels. No longer can we expect to have low gasoline prices. Our country has no mass public transit system therefore we are in a tough situation at best.
 

A Varanus bitatawa lizard ? Wow!

According to the catch line of the National Geographic article: "It has a double penis, is as long as a tall human, and lives in a heavily populated area of the Philippines. Yet somehow the giant lizard Varanus bitatawa has gone undetected by science until now."

My question is how could such a giant, cool lizard exist without scientist knowing they were alive? Well, they lived in trees  According to study team member and biologist Daniel Bennett of Mampam Conservatio "They spend all their time high up in trees, more than 20 meters [66 feet] above the ground." 
Long known to Filipino tribal hunters, the monitor lizard was identified as a new species in 2009 via its DNA, scale pattern, size, and peculiar penis, a new study says.
So all the locals knew about this cool lizard, but we did not?  It seems it is related to the Komodo Dragon; the one we've all viewed before and thought Wow what a big lizard.

So they are both huge lizards, so what  else is similar or different?
"Capturing both types of lizards was crucial, Bennett said, because it allowed the team to inspect the two monitor lizards side-by-side and detect subtle differences that can help determine whether the animals represent different species.
One particularly revealing trait was the double-ended penis common to monitor lizards. The shape of this reptilian feature is unique to each species."
 According to Benett the reason for not finding them sooner is"few reptile surveys of the mountain forests where V. bitatawa lives" have been taken. So in other words no scientist have had reason to study in this area of the rain forest do far.
What good consequences are the result of this finding? I think the best result is the simple knowledge that new species exist on this planet. Mush study remains available on this planet especially in the oceans that exist. This discovery opens up still remaining prospects of new adventure. And according to this text:     

"The process of science is a way of building knowledge about the universe" to "constructing new ideas that illuminate the world around us." New scientific knowledge may lead to new applications. For example, the discovery of the structure of DNA was a fundamental breakthrough in biology. It formed the underpinnings of research that would ultimately lead to a wide variety of practical applications, including DNA fingerprinting, genetically engineered crops, and tests for genetic diseases. Potential applications may motivate scientific investigations. For example, the possibility of genetically engineering bacteria to cheaply produce cutting-edge malaria drugs has motivated one researcher to continue his studies of synthetic biology.  New technological advances may lead to new scientific discoveries. For example, developing DNA copying and sequencing technologies has led to important breakthroughs in many areas of biology, especially in the reconstruction of the evolutionary relationships among organisms.

An Introduction to blogging!

"Some things I have to say aren't getting said
in this snowy, blonde, blue-eyed, gum chewing English"~Julia Alvarez 

For some time now I have been posting scientific items, as news worthy items, for a Biology in the News class presented by the distinguished Dr.R. Hardwick of Clemson University. Thus far, Dr. Hardwick and interested parties, I have failed to find a persona. Let me explain; I have now had adequate time to consider how best for me to present information and to whom that might be the audience.
Rather than trying to form myself into the rules of others; I have decided to make the rules myself. A) blogs must have credibility B) Blogs must contain information of interest C) Blogs must be concise and well written---keeping these ideas in mind I have now decided to aim my attention toward an audience that wants to know science stuff that is good stuff and includes progress that makes all of us whole and happy well informed people, and focus totally on credibility of the source and evidential support.
In short, why should I waste my time reading a blog? Certainly it must be because we find something in common with the writer of the blog or the persona of the writer, or the opinion of the blogger. His/her style or slant or down home folksy charm or something about the blogger we enjoy otherwise information generic.

Previously Unknown Stone Age People?

  

Reward if Found
      Fossils of three remains found in cave in China---"These new fossils might be of a previously unknown species, one that survived until the very end of the ice age." says Professor Curnoe of the University of South Wales. Due to the odd mosaic features, clarification of these fossils is forthcoming. The article indicates that the anatomical features of the fossils, both modern and archaic---are a highly unusual mix. The details of the discovery are located in this journal:  http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0031918

        It seems like every time I turn around new human fossils are found which allegedly connect us closer and closer to our humble beginnings so what-is-the-real-deal when it comes to fossils and humans? After reading this article I began to wonder what exactly is the truth to human remains discoveries? This is what I found: on a scale of confused a little to a lot...a lot!
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_human_evolution_fossils.
Or not so much confussion
http://australianmuseum.net.au/A-timeline-of-fossil-discoveries---which states--- 
       2010 - Release of nuclear DNA analysis carried out on a finger bone and tooth from Denisova cave,

Russia (found in 2008) reveals the remains come from a species that is neither Homo sapiens or Homo

neanderthalensis. This suggests a fourth human species (as Homo floresiensis was extant in Flores) was still

in existence between 48,000 and 30,000 years ago.








Now that we are all clear? Not! Scientists call the new find the "red-deer people"

 because they hunted extinct red deer and cooked them in caves at Maludong, near the city of Mengzi.

Read more: http://www.news.com.au/breaking-news/red-deer-people-discovered-in-china/story-e6frfku0-1226299896769#ixzz1pa636Jvb

 

After 2 hours of research and reading this article, I learned that writing about science can be difficult even for the professionals. The initial article I viewed said nothing more than what amounts to the finding in 1989 and subsequent study of findings in 2010. Really not what I'd call focused information. Just a few lines and a bunch of fluff. The lesson here is that whether it is biology or gossip online information, while credible in truth may not present a credible picture by the writer of the article.  There is a recent journal report and with  details form Professors findings. However that's about it! So when you undertake to discern information do so with caution. One must dig a little dipper than just on the surface to find the whole truth even from a respectable source.

 According to this web address, http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/03/120314124007.htm,the alledged credibly online source: ScienceDaily--- recently locatted fossils from two caves in south-west China "have revealed a previously unknown Stone Age people."

Can We Clone a Wolly Mammoth?

Thanks to the borrowing nature of squirrels and their nack for hiding treasures, scientists have been able reconstruct a 30,000 years old flower. According to the online article written by Valdimir Isachenkov for the Associated Press, Svetlana Yashina of the Institure of Cell Biophysics of the Russian Academy of Sciences used the hidden contents of a squirrel den found 125 feet below the surface in the Siberian permafrost, which contained fruit and seed,s to regenerate a flower from the tissue found inside. Russian scientists were able to fully construct the entire plant known as Sylene stenophylla.

It seems that the Siberian permafrost is a natural depository for everything that lived--- 30,000 years ago and more. Continued research into the permafrost will reveal a great deal of knowledge about our past. Of the reconstructed plant, Svetlana Yashina, who led the regeneration effort, said the new plant looks very similar one found in northeastern Siberia currently.

After investigating dozens of these fossil burrows located in ice deposits scients are confident of the future finds in the ice. The various layers of ice have yielded bones from large mammals, bison, deer, and a horse.
The study suggests that tissue can survive for thousands of years in the layers. The frozen ice acts as a tomd for all it envelopes. The research team hopes to find tissue of a mammoth so that a regeneration of a mammoth can be reconstructed.

What secrets await the scientists searching the cold of Siberia. Frozen in time, the contents of the den have given great promise to the scientific world. I think in the future we will be very surprised at the data found deep within the layers of this planet. Stored as sa harddrive from the past like a USB or jumpdrive hidden for all to find. What useful information can be gleaned from this experience?

Malnutrition, Hunger, and Finally Starvation

            Grim is the picture of someone starving to death.  As the body attempts to provide energy to the heart and lungs it literally eats its own muscle and tissues in a process termed catabolysis.  Victims of starvation are often too weak to sense thirst, and therefore become dehydrated.
All movements become painful due to atrophy of the muscles, and due to dry, cracked skin caused by severe dehydration. With a weakened body, diseases are commonplace. Fungi, for example, often grow under the esophagus, making swallowing unbearably painful.
The energy deficiency inherent in starvation causes fatigue and renders the victim more apathetic over time. As the starving person becomes too weak to move or even eat, his or her interaction with the surroundings diminishes.

            According to the World Health Organization hunger the single gravest threat to the world's public health. The WHO states that malnutrition is by far the biggest contributor to child mortality. Six million children die of hunger every year. Starvation is unacceptable in a society which has the resources to solve this critical problem. Are we to become known as the planet that died of starvation because we were too stupid or greedy to implement a solution? Or is the problem of starvation based on a ‘no money, no food’ attitude.

            A laboratory in the Netherlands may just have the answer to providing food for future generations. Imagine the reality of a yellow-pink sliver, the size of a corn plaster, as is the state-of-the-art in lab-grown meat and a milestone on the path to the world's first burger made from stem cells. A hamburger made from stem cells!
            In a recent online article, and according to Dr. Mark Post of Maastricht University, a complete burger has been created and will be publicly unveiled soon. Dr. Post hopes the Fat Duck restaurant in Berkshire, will cook the offering for a celebrity taster as yet unnamed. The project, funded by a wealthy, anonymous, individual aims to slash the number of cattle farmed for food, and in doing so reduce one of the major contributors to greenhouse gas emissions. Dr. Post claims, “Meat demand is going to double in the next 40 years and right now we are using 70% of all our agricultural capacity to grow meat through livestock."
            It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to understand the problems we face with food consumption and supply and demand. Below is a diagram of how the lab grown meat is grown.

 

 The inefficiency of cows and other animals in the production of meat, from farm to table, for a population expected to double in size is a problem. Post is focusing on making beef burgers from stem cells because cows are among the least efficient animals at converting the food they eat into food for humans.

"Cows and pigs have an efficiency rate of about 15%, which is pretty inefficient. Chickens are more efficient and fish even more," Post said. "If we can raise the efficiency from 15% to 50% it would be a tremendous leap forward." Post said he could theoretically increase the number of burgers made from a single cow from 100 to 100m. "That means we could reduce the number of livestock we use by 1m," he said. According to Dr. Post, “If lab-grown meat mimics farmed meat perfectly” – and Post admits it may not – the meat could become a premium product just as free range and organic items have.

            I am of the opinion that we should leave no stone unturned in the area of research for food supplies. No food, no life. I believe that in the future all food will be grown in the lab. I also promote the idea of lab-grown food. No longer can we afford to mine food from cows and other animals. What are we waiting on?

Stem Cell Research: Like

                After reading an article about a recent trial study taking place concerning stem cells and blindness, I came to realize how many questions I had about the ins and outs of stem cells. Questions like what exactly are stem cells? Where do stem cells come from and how can they help humans? The latter part of this question can be answered by reading the recent online article by Alice Park titled, “Early Success in Human Embryonic Stem Cell trial to Treat Blindness,” (http://healthland.time.com/2012/01/24/early-success-in-a-human-embryonic-stem-cell-trial-to-treat-blindness/), which suggests promising results have been reached in a recent trial concerning the use of embryonic stem cells.

            Embryonic stem cells are extracted directly from an embryo before the embryo's cells begin to differentiate and according to Medical.net and can be defined as a human pluripotent stem cell, one of the cells that are self-replicating, and are derived from human embryos or human fetal tissue, and are known to develop into cells and tissues of the three primary germ layers. Although human pluripotent stem cells can be derived from embryos or fetal tissue, such stem cells are not embryos. "Self-replicating" means the cell can divide and to form cells indistinguishable from it. The "three primary germ layers" -- called the ectoderm, mesoderm, and endoderm -- are the primary layers of cells in the embryo from which all tissues and organs develop.
            According to Alice park, researchers from the UCLA Jules Stein Eye Institute “launched a first-ever study” to show that stem cells may help to reverse patients’ disease and in this case blindness. Can you imagine healing blindness! The safety trial, which monitored the results after 2 patients suffering from progressive blindness were injected with retinal cells derived from embryonic stem cells, reported small improvements. According to Dr. Steven Schwartz, lead author of the paper and director of the Diabetic Eye Disease and Retinal Vascular Center at UCLA, “It opens the door for multiple strategies in the field.”
            In short, the recent trial, which basically injected retinal cells into humans, gives evidence and encouragement for the scientific community and the field of regenerative medicine. I’m sure that Sue Freeman, age 78 and 1 of the two initial patients, is glad the research is available   the point of this post is to argue for results of stem cell research.  So what is the controversy all about? Those who value human life from the point of conception, oppose embryonic stem cell research because the extraction of stem cells from this type of an embryo requires its destruction. In other words, it requires that a human life be killed. Some believe this to be the same as murder. Against this, embryonic research advocates argue that the tiny blastocyst has no human features. Further, new stem cell lines already exist due to the common practice of in vitro fertilization. Research advocates conclude that many fertilized human cells have already been banked, but are not being made available for research. Advocates of embryonic stem cell research claim new human lives will not be created for the sole purpose of experimentation.

Others argue against such research on medical grounds. Mice treated for Parkinson's with embryonic stem cells have died from brain tumors in as much as 20% of cases. Embryonic stem cells stored over time have been shown to create the type of chromosomal anomalies that create cancer cells. So what is the answer? I think we can no longer grapple with childish hobgoblins of the mind, but we are called to act as accountable responsible stewards of humanity---help those in need of help!

.

Does smoking marijuana help your memory?

Much of my childhood was wasted; spent in heated debates with my parents. I, on the one side arguing pro marijuana, while my parents, the United States Government, and just about every other establishment in the United States on the other side urging me to come to the realization that smoking marijuana results in the genocide of all my living brain cells, not to mention a myriad of other results, all bad and all rendering the user a vegetable for life. Perhaps! But, could it be possible that all the old arguments were propaganda based or simply opinion based? A recent article posted on BioEd Online titled, Marijuana may make your brain grow: Cannabinoid injections sprout new neurons in mice, by Geoff Brumfiel, claims, “Most addictive drugs inhibit the growth of new brain cells. But injections of a cannabis-like chemical seem to have the opposite effect in mice, according to new research.”

“Neuropsychologist Xia Zhang and a team of researchers based at the University of Saskatchewan in Saskatoon, Canada, aimed to find out just how marijuana-like drugs, known collectively as cannabinoids, act on the brain. The researchers injected rats with HU210, a synthetic drug that is about one-hundred times as powerful as THC, the high-inducing compound naturally found in marijuana. They then used a chemical tracer to watch new cells growing in the hippocampus,” states Geoff.  According to my Wikipedia research the hippocampus plays an important role in the consolidation of information from short term memory and long term memory. In other words, the research indicates that growing new brain cells improves memory while combating depression and mood disorders. Another professional in the field of addiction, Amelia Eisch, an addiction researcher at the University Of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas excitedly says, "It makes marijuana look more like an antidepressant and less like a drug of abuse."

The real question that remains unanswered is why cannabinoids have a different effect on the brain than other addictive drugs. This unanswered question is high on the list of new research and will only help to confirm my lifelong belief that marijuana possesses a medicinal value. I suggest that the proof is in the pudding. I have smoked marijuana many times. My memory remains intact thus I call out the naysayers and challenge them to prove otherwise. Anyone can claim anything they want to claim, parents, schools, and even governments, but that does not make it a point of fact. Let’s promote an atmosphere, not based on an outsider mentality or one that grapples as children with opinion, but an atmosphere based on rigorous intellectual truth!